نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بینالملل دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق تجارت و سرمایه گذاری بین المللی دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Choosing the proper method for resolving disputes in the oil and gas industry is important and among these various methods, However, it is less acceptable to refer to an expert-determination than other dispute resolution methods, but because of the technical nature of issues, the speed and accuracy of experts in decision making, referring disputes to expert-determination is of particular priority and importance. And in some cases, such as estimating the volume of reserves, the financial value of the benefits of participating and reviewing the base price of gas sales contracts, It is the best possible solution for resolving disputes. For this reason, identifying common expert characteristics in the legal doctrine and documents of international organizations and also examining the special advantages of this method in contracts concluded in oil and gas industry can help its development in this contractual system. The most important challenge of using this method is how to implement them in the courts of justice. In this article, by analyzing the legal bases related to the principle of free will and validity of regulatory documents outside Iran, an attempt has been made to provide a solution for the implementation of expert-determination in Iranian legal and judicial system.
کلیدواژهها [English]
الف) فارسی
https://jlq.ut.ac.ir/article_29549_4a52d3fd705ec65e476212bd765c1826.pdf
ب)خارجی
- Books:
11.Martin, Elizabeth A. & Jonathan Law. 2006, Oxford Dictionary of Law, 6th end, New York, Oxford University press
12.Redfan, Alan & Martin Hunter. 2009, Redfan & Hunter on International Arbitration, 5th end, new york, Oxford University press
- Articles:
3/arb2013_vol79no3augustl007.pdf
15.Douglas, Jones S. (1997), “Is expert determination a “final and binding” alternative?”, Arbitration, Vol.63 No. 3: 213-226; Available at: https://kluwerlawonline.
com/journalarticle/Arbitration:+The+International+Journal+of+Arbitration,+Mediation+and+Dispute+Management/63.3/AMDM1997042
key=1368
18.Pierce E. David, (2005), “Interpreting oil and gas instruments”, Texas Journal of oil, gas and energy Law, Vol.1: 1- 34; Available at: https://www.washburnlaw.edu
/profiles/faculty/activity/_fulltext/pierce-david-2006-1texasjournalofoilgasandenergylaw1.pdf
15362729/BINDING_ALTERNATIVE_DISPUTE_RESOLUTION_ADR_IN_THE_OIL_and_GAS_SECTOR-_A_BRIEF_ASSESSMENT
https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2011&context=tlr
21.Stulz- Karim S.P., (2007), “Expert Determination in International Oil & Gas Disputes: The Impact of Lack of Harmonization in Reservers Classifications Systems and Uncertainty in reserves Estimates”, SPE International, 15th: 1- 14; available at: https://doi.org/10.2118/105361-MS
پ) اسناد و منابع اینترنتی
22.Bennett, Michael. (2016), Process in expert determination, Available at www.michaeljbennett.com.au
27.ICC International Centre for ADR. (2017), Expert Rules, Paris, available at: https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2015/01/2015-ICC-Expert-Rules-ENGLISH-version-1.pdf