تحلیل علل برچیده‌سازی تأسیسات فراساحلی فرسودة نفت‌‌وگاز از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت قراردادهای بین‌المللی نفت‌وگاز، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامة طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین‌الملل، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامة طباطبایی، تهران، ‌ایران.

3 استادیار گروه مهندسی مکانیک، دانشگاه صنعت نفت، آبادان، ایران.

چکیده

آخرین عملیات نفتی در میادین فراساحلی نفت‌وگاز، برچیدن تأسیسات فرسوده است که با ریسک‌های فنی، مالی و زیست‌محیطی زیادی همراه است. با توجه به مشکلات موجود برای پیمانکارها و دولت‌های صاحب منبع، این مسئله مطرح است که علل عملیات برچیده‌سازی تأسیسات فرسوده، از سمت برخی معاهدات چیست و آیا این علل در سطح بین‌المللی از چنان اعتباری برخوردار هستند که بتوان آن‌ها را واجد ویژگی عرفی ‌بین‌المللی یا اصل کلی حقوقی دانست. در این مقاله، مسئلة طرح‌شده با روش توصیفی‌-تحلیلی مبتنی‌بر مستندات بین‌المللی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته ‌است. براساس نتایج و یافته‌های این پژوهش، علل عملیات برچیده‌سازی به‌ترتیب عبارت‌اند از: «ایمنی دریانوردی»، «حفاظت از محیط‌زیست‌ دریایی» و «رعایت حقوق دیگران» که به پذیرش و اجرای عملیات فوق انجامیده ‌است. هرچند علل مذکور درعمل هنوز نتوانسته‌اند ویژگی عرفی‌بودن را کسب کنند، باوجوداین، از شرایط «اصل ‌کلی ‌حقوقی» در ذیل اصل «برچیده‌سازی سازگار با محیط‌زیست دریایی» برخوردارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Legal Necessities of Decommissioning of Retired Offshore Oil and Gas Installations in International Law

نویسندگان [English]

  • Farideh Vaez 1
  • Mehryar Dashab 2
  • pedram edalat 3
1 PhD Candidate in International Oil & Gas Contract Management, Faculty of Law & Political Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran,
2 Assistant Profesor., Public and International Law Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran,
3 Assistant Profesor., Mechanic Engineering Department, Petroleum University of Technology, Abadan, Iran,
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The decommissioning phase for offshore oil and gas installations begins when their productive lifespan concludes, generally around 30 years, or when the associated hydrocarbon reservoirs are no longer economically viable. At this point, these installations, which once yielded financial gains, now pose additional costs and significant environmental and technical risks. While economically it may seem prudent to avoid decommissioning, industrial activities cannot be assessed solely on economic grounds; they carry environmental, social, and legal responsibilities that necessitate careful consideration.
Research Method and Question
This article employs a descriptive-analytical approach to explore the reasons, as derived from international and regional documents, that render decommissioning of offshore installations legally mandatory. It also examines whether these reasons meet the criteria to be considered "international customary law" or "general principles."
Background
To date, no specific research addresses the legal bases for decommissioning retired offshore installations within international law, though some related works reference international documents, regional regulations, and domestic laws that outline decommissioning as necessary.
Findings
The primary reasons for decommissioning retired offshore installations are: ensuring navigational safety, protecting the marine environment, and respecting the rights of others. These derive from several principles of international law, including the "principle of navigational safety," "principle of prevention," "precautionary principle," "principle of compensation for environmental damage," "principle of sustainable use of natural resources" (or sustainable development), "principle of environmental impact assessment," and "principle of energy justice."
Customary Law and General Principles
This research investigates whether these decommissioning requirements, grounded in international and regional documents, can hold as customary international law absent specific treaties like the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, or the 1972 London Convention on Dumping of Wastes at Sea and its 1996 Protocol. For decommissioning to qualify as customary international law, it must satisfy the two elements of "general practice" and "acceptance as law." However, while general practices exist, the recognition of decommissioning as customary international law remains uncertain (Kashani & Rezaeanmehr, 2016). As a result, this study considers "general principles" as another possible source of obligation under Article 38 of the ICJ Statute. General principles, if "widespread and representative," can bridge gaps where treaty obligations or customary laws are absent.
Conclusion
Decommissioning retired offshore installations incurs substantial costs, yet this should not deter compliance. International and regional agreements underscore the main objectives of decommissioning: navigational safety, marine environmental protection, and respect for others' rights, all rooted in legal principles such as navigational safety, prevention, the precautionary principle, compensation for environmental damage, sustainable development, environmental impact assessment, and energy justice. These principles collectively support a "principle of compatible decommissioning with the marine environment," which could become a binding source even in the absence of treaties or customary law.
To formalize this general principle, international collaboration is essential. It is recommended that offshore-resource nations partner with global organizations—such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), World Bank, and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)—to draft a comprehensive international treaty on offshore decommissioning. This treaty should address navigational, environmental, social, and economic concerns to establish universal standards and ensure decommissioning aligns with international legal obligations.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Safety of navigation
  • Protection of marine environment
  • Respecting the others’ rights
  • General principal law

مراجع

منابع
ابراهیمی، نصرالله؛ دانایی، کیمیا؛ کورکی‌نژاد‌قرایی، مجید (۱۳۹۵). «رژیم حقوقی حاکم بر برچیدن تأسیسات نفتی در فراساحل در کنوانسیون‌های بین‌المللی و حقوق نروژ و انگلیس». فصلنامة مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، شمارة 3، ص۳62-۳43.
DOI: 20.1001.1.25885618.1395.46.3.1.8   
افضلی، علی (۱۴۰۰). «ایجاد درآمد پایدار از محل مولدسازی زمین‌های دولتی؛ بررسی تجربة کشورهای منتخب». گزارش‌های کارشناسی پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی.  در:‌https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1660913 (7 آبان ۱۴۰۳)
رضاییان‌مهر، مصطفی (۱۳۸۷). «برررسی وضعیت حقوقی برچیدن تأسیسات نفت‌وگاز». پایان‌نامة کارشناسی‌ارشد، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران.
سالاری، اسماء (۱۳۹۹). «ارزیابی زیست‌محیطی فرامرزی در حقوق بین‌الملل». مطالعات حقوق بین‌الملل، دورة ۵۰، شمارة 4، ص۱۳55-۱۳31..https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2020.299162.2355     
شاکری، عباس (۱۳۹۲). اقتصاد کلان: نظریه‌ها و سیاست‌ها. جلد اول، چاپ چهارم، تهران، انتشارات رافع.
شیروی، حسین؛ فلاحتی، مهین (۱۳۹۸). «حقوق حاکم بر قراردادهای برچیدن تأسیسات نفت‌وگاز». پژوهش ‌حقوق‌ عمومی،‌ ‌شمارة 64، ۱63-۱3۳.https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2019.34336.1909   
شیرازیان، شیرین؛ حیدری، فلورا؛ حیدری، مهدی (۱۳۹۸). «ضرورت اجرای اصل احتیاطی در حفاظت از محیط‌زیست». علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌‌زیست، شمارة 5، ص۲18-۲07.DOI: 10.22034/jest.2019.26005.3494
  ضیایی، سیدیاسر؛ لطفی گماسایی، محسن (۱۴۰۰). «مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت‌های فراملی؛ فرصت‌ها و چالش‌ها». پژوهش‌های حقوقی، شمارة 46، ص۲82-۲55.DOI: JLR.2021.132621/10, 48300
  کاشانی، جواد؛ رضاییان‌مهر، مصطفی (۱۳۹۵). «برچیدن تأسیسات نفت‌وگاز دریایی از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل». پژوهش‌های حقوق عمومی، شمارة 50، ص63-59.https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2016.3966  
فتحی، هومن؛ میرعباسی، سیدباقر؛ پورنوری، منصور (۱۴۰۰). «اقدامات پیشگیرانة دولت‌ها درجهت حفاظت از محیط‌زیست دریایی ناشی از حمل‌ونقل مواد خطرناک در مرحلة قبل از وقوع حادثه». فصلنامة علمی تحقیقات حقوقی بین‌المللی، ‌شمارة 53، ص62-45. DOI: 10.30495/ALR.2021.683849   
موسوی، سید فضل‌الله؛ آرش‌پور، علی‌رضا (۱۳۹۴). «جایگاه اصل احتیاطی در حقوق بین‌الملل محیط‌زیست». مطالعات حقوق عمومی،‌ شمارة 2، ص۱79-۱67.‌ https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2015.54817
References
 Abdo, Hafez (2018) Review of Oil and Gas Decommissioning: law, policy and comparative practice Book. Available at: http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/30832/1/PubSub6997_Abdo.pdf, (Accessed 12 October 2024).
Afzali, Ali (2021). “Creating a stable income from the production site of government lands; Examining the experience of selected countries Report”. researches of the Islamic Council. ‌https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1660913, (Accssed 2 November 2024), [In Persian].
Barral, Virginie (2012). “Sustainable Development in International Law: Nature and Operation of an Evolutive Legal Norm”. EJIL, Vol. 23(2), pp. 377-400. https://academic.oup.com/ejil/article/23/2/377/487236.
Bulletin No.31, Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs: 1996.
Cameron, Peter; Stanley, Micheal (2017). oil, Gas and Mining: A sourcebook for Understanding the Extractive Industries. Washington DC, World Bank Group.
Daintith, Terence; Willoughby, Geoffery (1996). United Kingdom Oil and Gas Law. vol.2, London, Sweet & Maxwell.
Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, ILC, 2006. 
Draft conclusions on identification of customary international law, Adopted by the International Law Commission, 2018.
Draft conclusions on Peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens), Adopted by the International Law Commission, A/74/10: 2019.
Draft principles on the allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, ILC, 2006.
Ebrahimi, S.N; Danaie, Kimia; Korakinejad, Majid (2016). “The legal regime governing the decommissioning of offshore petroleum installations in international conventions and Norway and England laws”. Private Law Studies Quarteries, Vol.46, Issue (3), pp. 343-362. DOI: 20.1001.1.25885618.1395.46.3.1.8, [In Persian].
Falconer, Callum; Wicks, Chris (2016). Decommissioning and the Offshore Oil and Gas Life Cycle, in Oil and Gas Decommissioning: Law, Policy and Comparative Practice. Hammerson, Marc; Nicholas Antonas, Second Edition, the UK: Globe Law and Business Ltd.
Fathi, Houman ; Mir Abbasi, S. Mohammad Bagher ; Pour Nouri, Mansour (2021). “Governments' preventive action to protect the marine environment caused by the transportation of dangerous substances before the accident”. International Legal Reserarch Scientific Quarterly, Vol.14, Issue (53), pp. 45-62. https://doi.org/10.30495/alr.2021.683849,   [In Persian]
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia (2017). “Legitimacy of International Environmental Law, The Sovereign States Overwhelmed by Obligations: Responsibility to React to Problems Beyond National Jurisdiction?”. Heidelberg Journal of International law, Vol.77(2), pp. 339-370. at: http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/25610 (Accessed 20 October 2024).
Fujii, Toyonobu ; Jamieson, Alan J. (2016). “Fine-scale monitoring of fish movements and multiple environmental parameters around a decommissioned offshore oil platform: A pilot study in the North Sea”. Ocean Engineering Journal, Vol.126, pp. 481-487.  at:     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.09.003
Giannopoulos, Nikolaos (2020). International Law and Offshore Energy Production: Marine Environmental Protection through Normative Interactions. Ridderprint, the Netherlands.
Heery, Eliza et al. (2017). “Identifying the consequences of ocean sprawl for sedimentary”. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, pp. 31-48.   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2017.01.020.
Heffron, R. (2018). “Energy law for decommissioning in the energy sector in the 21st century”. World Energy Law & Business, No. 11(3), pp. 189-195,    https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwy013.
Heffron, Raphael J; McCauley, Darren (2017). “The concept of energy justice across the disciplines”. Energy Policy, No. (105), pp. 658-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018.
ICF Incorporated )2016). Decommissioning Methodology and cost valuation, Prepared for U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. Available at: https://www.bsee.gov/sites/bsee.gov/files/tap-technical-assessment-program/738aa.pdf (Accessed 23 October 2024).
Kashani, Javad; Rezaeyan Mehr, Mostafa (2016). “Decommissioning of Offshore Oil and Gas Installations under the International Law”. Public Law Research, Vol.17, Issue (50), pp. 59-63.       https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2016.3966 [In Persian].
Kerbrat, Yann ; Maljean-Dubois, Sandrine (2019). The Role of International Law in the Promotion of the Precautionary Principle. Carina Costa de Oliveira, Gabriela G. B. Lima Moraes, Fabrício Ramos Ferreira (dir.), A interpretação do princípio da precaução no direito brasileiro, no direito comparado e no direito internacional, Pontes, pp. 275-284. ⟨halshs-02342746⟩ (Accessed 17 October 2024).
Kolian Stephan R; Godec, Michael; Sammarco, Paul W. (2019). “Alternate uses of retired oil and gas platforms in the Gulf of Mexico’. Ocean and Coastal Management, No. (167), pp. 52-59.
         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.002.
Lowe, Vaughen (1999). “Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments”. in International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges, Boyle and D. Freestone (eds), the UK: Oxford.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298076.003.0002
Markus A. Höllerer (2012). “Corporate social responsibility (CSR)”. in Between creed, rhetoric façade, and disregard: Dissemination and theorization of corporate social responsibility in Austria: Peter Lang International Publishers.
Mayorga Alba, Eleodoro (2010). Environmental Governance in Oil Producing Developing Countries: Findings from a Survey 32 Countries: World Bank.
 Moore, Simon (2016). “Decommissioning Contracts”. in Oil and Gas Decommissioning: Law, Policy and Comparative Practice, Hammerson, Marc; Nicholas Antonas, Second Edition, the UK: Globe Law and Business Ltd.
Mousavi, S. Fazlollah; Arashpour, Alireza (2018). The “Principle of Prevention”. in international environmental law, Public Law Studies Quarterly, Vol.48, No. (1), pp. 167-179.https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2015.54817 [In Persian].
Nalule, Victoria (2018). Decommissioning of oil and gas installation (3-5) [Video file]. Retrieved from http://Decommissioning Oil & Gas installations (3/5) - YouTube  YouTube https://m.youtube.com› watch    (Accessed 12 October 2023).
OSPAR Decision 98/3 on the Disposal of Disused Offshore Installations, 1998.
Policy paper “Oil and gas taxation: Transferable tax history and retention of decommissioning expenditure”, 2018.
Protocol Concerning Marine Pollution Resulting from Exploration and Exploitation of The Continental Shelf (Kuwait Protocle), 1989.
Potocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution Resulting from Exploration and Exploitation of the Continental Shelf and the Seabed and its Subsoil, Spain, 1994.
Protocol to the Abidjan Convention on “Environmental Norms and Standards for Offshore Oil and Gas Explorationand Exploitation Activities (Malabo Protocol)”, 2017.
Réglat-Boireau, Arnaud (1982). “La désaffectation des installations en mer”. Annuaire français de droit international, volume 28. at: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ afdi_0066-3085_1982_num_28_1_2521 [In French].
Reinhardt, Robert; Stavins, N; Vietor, Richard H. K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility Through an Economic Lens Forest. UK, Oxford University Press.
Resolution on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, General Assemby of United Nation, 2022.
Resolution A.672 (16): Guidelines and Standards for the Removal of Offshore Installations and Structures on The Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone, International Maritime Organization (IMO), 1989.
Rezaeyanmehr, Mostafa (2009). “Legal Aspect of Decommissioning of Oil and Gas Installations”. LL.M Dissertation, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran [In Persian and English].
Salari, Asma (2021). “Transboundary Environmental Impact Assessment in International Environmental Law”. Public Law Studies Quartery, Vol.50, Issue (4), pp. 1331-1355. https://doi.org/10.22059/jplsq.2020.299162.2355[In Persian]
Sands, philippe (2007). “Litigating Environment Dispute: Courts, Tribunals and Progressive Development of International Environmental Law”. in Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes, Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas Menash, Brill.   https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161566.i-1188.96.
Sari, Ramazan; Voyvoda, Ebru; Lacey-Barnacel, Max; Karababa, Eminegul (2017). “Energy Justice: A Social Sciences and Humanitaries Cross-Cutting Theme Report”. European Union, Technical Report.
        DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33861.35043.
Shakeri, Abbas (2013). Macroeconomics: Theories and Policies. Vol.1, Tehran, Iran, Rafe Publication [In Persian].
Shiravi, Abdolhossein; Falahati, Mahin (2020). “The law governing the decommissioning of oil and gas installations”. Public Law Research, Vol. 21, Issue (64), pp. 59-63. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2019.34336.1909 [In Persian].
Shirazian, Shirin; Heidari, Flora; Heidari, Mehdi (2019). “Necessity of Implementing Precautionary Principles in Environmental Protection”. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Vol.21, Issue (5), pp. 207-218. DOI: 10.22034/jest.2019.26005.3494 [In Persian].
Sommer, Brigitt; M. Fowler, Ashley; Macreadie, Peter I, Palandro; David A; Aziz, Azivy C; Booth, David J.  (2019). “Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas structures– Environmental opportunities and challenges”. Science of the Total Environment, Vol.658, pp. 973-981.     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.193.
Stefanik, Kirsten (2017). The Environment and Armed Conflict: Employing General Principles to Protect the Environmen. Oxford Publication.   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198784630.003.0005
The Intenational Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter (London Convention), 1972.
The International Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), 1998.
The International Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (Espoo Convention), Espoo, Finland, 1991.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992.
The Convention for Cooperation in the Protection, Management and Development of the Marine and Coastal Environment of the Atlantic Coast of the West, Central and Southern Africa Region, (Abidjan Convention), 1981.
The Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution (Barcelona Convention), 1976.
The Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), amended on 24 July 1998.
The “London Protocol” on Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 1996.
The North-East Atlantic Environment Strategy: for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic 2010–2020 (OSPAR Agreement 2010-3).
The team of Environmental Resources Management: Inc. (ERM) specialists (2009). Sustainable Decommissioning of Oil Fields and Mines. The World Bank pub.
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982.
The UNEP-Division of Environmental Policy Implementation, 2003.
Third report on general principles of law by Marcelo Vázquez-Bermúdez, Special Rapporteur, 2022 A/CN.4/75., International Law Commission, seventy-second session, 2021.
Towards Sustainable Decommissioning and Closure of Oil Fields and Mines: A Toolkit to Assist Government Agencies, World Bank Multistakeholder Initiative, 2010.
Ziaee, S. Yaser; Lotfi Ghamasaei, Mohsen (2021). “Transnational Corporate Social Responsibility; Opportunities and Challenges”. Journal of Legal Research, Vol. 20, Issue (46), pp. 255-282.
DOI: 10.48300/jlr.2021.132621 [In Persian].
مطالعات حقوق انرژی
دوره 9، شماره 2
بهمن 1402
صفحه 377-404

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار